Ad engagement

In online marketing, ad engagement has emerged as an essential indicator for publishers seeking to optimize their ad inventory and improve user experience.

In this comprehensive exploration, I delve into the multifaceted nature of ad engagement, its importance for publishers, and how it impacts revenue and user satisfaction.

What is ad engagement?

Ad engagement refers to the spectrum of consumer activities and experiences—cognitive, emotional, and physical—that occur in response to digital advertisements. The Internet Advertising Bureau (IAB) defines it as “a spectrum of consumer advertising activities and experiences, cognitive, emotional, and physical, that will have a positive impact on a brand” (source).

For publishers, understanding ad engagement is crucial for several reasons:

  1. Revenue optimization: Higher engagement often correlates with better ad performance, potentially leading to increased revenue.
  2. User experience: Engaging ads can enhance rather than detract from the overall site experience.
  3. Advertiser relationships: Demonstrating strong engagement metrics often attracts premium advertisers and fosters long-term partnerships.
  4. Content strategy: Insights from ad engagement help shape content creation and placement strategies.

Example: A news publisher notices that in-article video ads have a 30% higher completion rate than sidebar display ads. This insight leads them to redesign their article layout to accommodate more in-article video placements, resulting in a 20% increase in ad revenue without significantly impacting user experience.

Key engagement metrics

Understanding and tracking the right engagement metrics helps publishers optimize ad inventory and improve user experience. Here’s an in-depth look at the most critical metrics.

Click-through rate (CTR)

While the click-through rate remains a traditional metric, publishers need to consider it in context with other engagement indicators. CTR measures the percentage of users who click on an ad after viewing it.

An illustration visualizing the formula for click-through rate: CTR equals clicks divided by number of impressions
Set up A/B tests to optimize the click-through rate of your ad units

Example: A news publisher might observe that native ads integrated into their content streams achieve a 2% CTR, compared to 0.5% for standard banner ads. However, this metric alone doesn’t provide a complete picture of ad effectiveness.

CTR can vary significantly across different ad formats and placements. While helpful, it shouldn’t be the sole focus, as it doesn’t capture the full spectrum of user engagement. 

Our comprehensive guide on click-through rate provides more detailed information.

Time-based metrics

These metrics provide deeper insights into user engagement by measuring ad exposure and interaction duration. 

Key time-based metrics include:

  • Time spent viewing an ad
  • Percentage of ads visible
  • Average view duration (for video ads)
  • Completion rate (for video ads)

Time-based metrics are becoming increasingly important, and some publishers, like the Financial Times, are adopting time-based advertising models. These models charge advertisers based on how much time users spend with an ad rather than just impressions or clicks.

Example: A lifestyle blog publisher discovers that their long-form article pages with auto-playing video ads have an average view time of 15 seconds, compared to 5 seconds for static banner ads. This insight leads them to create more long-form content and optimize video ad placements within these articles.

Interaction rate

This metric measures users’ actions with an ad, providing insights into active engagement. 

Interactions can include:

  • Expanding a rich media unit
  • Turning on sound for a video ad
  • Interacting with interactive elements (e.g., swiping, tapping)
  • Hovering over an ad

Interaction rates can vary widely depending on the ad format and content.

Example: A tech news site implements expandable banner ads and finds that users spend an average of 30 seconds interacting with the expanded content, leading to a 25% increase in brand recall for advertisers.

Viewability

Viewability is a prerequisite for engagement, measuring whether visitors had the opportunity to see a specific ad. The IAB defines a display ad as viewable if 50% of its pixels are in view for at least one second, while a video ad is viewable if 50% of its pixels are in view for at least two seconds (source).

Example: A sports news publisher redesigns its mobile site to ensure ads load only when they are about to enter the viewport. This new layout increases viewability rates from 60% to 85% and improves overall engagement metrics.

Engagement rate

The engagement rate is a comprehensive metric that combines multiple factors to provide a holistic view of ad performance. It captures various aspects of user interaction with an ad beyond simple click-through rates.

It’s important to note that there isn’t a universally standardized formula for engagement rate. Publishers often customize this metric to better reflect their ad formats and business objectives.

To calculate the engagement rate, publishers typically use a formula that incorporates several key metrics:

A formula showing how to calculate engagement rate: Engagement Rate = (Total Engagements / Total Impressions) * 100
How to calculate engagement rate

Here, “Total Engagements” can include:

  1. Clicks
  2. Interactions (e.g., expanding rich media ads, turning on sound for video ads)
  3. Time spent viewing the ad (often with a minimum threshold)
  4. Scroll depth (for in-content ads)

The specific components and their weights can vary depending on the publisher’s goals and ad formats. 

For example:

  • For video ads: (Views + Clicks + Completed Views) / Impressions
  • For display ads: (Clicks + Hover Time + Scroll Depth) / Impressions

Some publishers assign different weights to these components based on their perceived value. 

For instance:

Engagement Rate = ((Clicks x 1.5) + (Interactions x 1.0) + (Time Spent > 5s x 0.5)) / Impressions

Example: A publisher finds that their native content recommendations have an engagement rate of 3.5%, compared to 1.2% for standard display ads. This insight helps them optimize their ad mix to favor more engaging formats.

Types of ad engagement

Recognizing and leveraging different types of ad engagement helps publishers optimize strategies and increase revenue. Ad engagement falls into two main categories: active and passive. Measuring both forms gives publishers a comprehensive view of advertising performance.

By evaluating both types of engagement, publishers refine their approaches, enhance inventory value for advertisers, and maintain a positive user experience. Let’s dive into the details of active and passive engagement.

Active engagement

Active engagement refers to deliberate, measurable actions that users take when interacting with an ad. These actions require conscious effort from the user and often indicate a higher interest or intent. Active engagement is particularly valuable for publishers as it demonstrates a strong connection between the user and the advertised content.

Key forms of active engagement include:

  1. Clicks: This is the most direct form of active engagement
  2. Shares: When users share an ad on their social media profiles or through messaging apps, indicating they find the content valuable or interesting
  3. Comments: Users leaving comments on sponsored posts or ads show high involvement with the content
  4. Likes/reactions: Users can express their sentiments about an ad by liking it or using other reaction options on social media platforms
  5. Form submissions: Users fill out forms within or after clicking on an ad, demonstrating strong intent

Example: A technology news site publishes a sponsored article about a new smartphone. A reader clicks on the article, reads it thoroughly, and then shares it on Twitter with a comment about the phone’s features. This series of actions demonstrates high active engagement with the sponsored content.

Passive engagement

Passive engagement involves less explicit interactions with ads. While these actions may seem less significant, they still raise brand awareness and recall while providing valuable insights into user interest and ad effectiveness.

It is often more common than active engagement and can be a precursor to more active interactions.

Key forms of passive engagement include:

  1. Video views: Users watch video ads, even without clicking or interacting further
  2. Hover-overs: When users pause their cursor over an ad, indicating curiosity or interest
  3. Scroll depth: How far users scroll through content containing ads, especially for native advertising or sponsored content
  4. Time spent: The duration users spend on a page with an ad, even if they don’t interact directly with it
  5. Impressions: While not strictly engaging, the number of times an ad is displayed can be considered passive engagement

Example: A lifestyle publisher includes a native ad for a new skincare product within an article about beauty routines. A reader spends 45 seconds on the page, scrolling through the entire article, including the native ad section. While they don’t click or interact directly with the ad, their time spent and scroll depth indicate passive engagement with the content.

Factors influencing ad engagement

Understanding the factors influencing ad engagement can help publishers optimize their ad strategies and maximize revenue. Let’s explore these key factors in detail.

Ad relevance

Ad relevance is a critical factor in driving engagement. Highly targeted and contextually relevant ads tend to generate higher engagement rates. Publishers should consider user demographics, interests, and behavior when placing ads.

contextual targeting example
Example of contextual targeting using the keyword targeting feature from Advanced Ads

Example: A tech review blog implements contextual targeting for its affiliate marketing campaigns. Displaying smartphone accessory ads alongside smartphone review articles achieves a 40% higher click-through rate than randomly placed ads.

Creative quality

High-quality, original ad content with compelling visuals, clear messaging, and interactive elements is more likely to drive user interactions. Publishers should focus on creating or sourcing ads that resonate with their target audience.

Example: A fitness and nutrition website creates a series of interactive infographic ads for its affiliate products. These engaging ads, which allow users to explore different workout routines and meal plans, achieve a 60% higher engagement rate than static banner ads.

Ad placement

The context and location of ad placement significantly impact engagement levels. Ads that feel native to the platform and appear in relevant contexts perform better, resulting in less banner blindness.

Example: A gardening blog strategically places affiliate links for gardening tools within its how-to articles. This contextual placement results in a 3× higher click-through rate than sidebar ads on the same site.

Audience targeting

Precise audience segmentation leads to more relevant ad delivery and higher engagement. Publishers should use data to create specific audience segments based on various criteria.

Example: To improve the monetization of a travel blog, a publisher uses its first-party data to segment their audience based on preferred travel destinations. By displaying affiliate ads for location-specific travel gear to these segments, the blog sees a 35% increase in ad engagement and a 20% boost in affiliate commissions.

Format and size

Ad format and size can significantly influence engagement rates. Depending on the content and layout of the publisher’s site, some ad formats may perform better than others.

Example: A cooking website tests various ad formats for its Amazon affiliate products. In-content native ads for cooking utensils outperform traditional banner ads by 45% in terms of click-through rates.

Page speed

If ads slow down page load times, they can negatively impact ad engagement. Publishers need to balance ad implementation with site performance.

Example: A news publisher optimizes their ad loading process, implementing lazy loading for below-the-fold ads. This improvement reduces page load time by 2 seconds, resulting in a 15% decrease in bounce rate and a 10% increase in overall ad engagement.

User experience (UX)

Ads that enhance rather than disrupt the user experience are more likely to generate positive engagement.

Example: A fashion blog implements a slideshow-style ad format for clothing affiliate products that matches its editorial content. This UX-friendly approach leads to a 50% increase in user interaction with the ads compared to pop-up formats.

Publishers who focus on understanding these factors and how they relate to their individual, unique projects can optimize them and greatly enhance ad engagement rates, boosting the performance of affiliate marketing campaigns and driving higher revenue.

Conclusion on ad engagement

Ad engagement is a multifaceted concept crucial to publishers’ success in digital advertising. By understanding and optimizing various engagement metrics, from CTR to viewability, publishers create more effective ad strategies that balance user experience with revenue generation.

Due to the fluid nature of their playing field, digital publishers must continually adapt their approaches to ad engagement. By focusing on factors such as ad relevance, creative quality, and user experience, they build stronger connections with their audience while maximizing the value of their ad inventory.

Make it better

Increase your ad management skills without spending more time.
Join over 150,000 publishers and AdOpts increasing their ad revenue.